Bob Shields in Court DeepwaterResistance.org Home E-letters Contribute Take action Block Island Contact About Us FAQ
Michael Beauregard
Bait and Switch,all around One of the Last Great....Bait & Switches.  Yes, Block Island is one of the Last Great Places in the  Western Hemisphere.  But, it is also one of the best examples of public officials and corporate  executives pulling the wool over the eyes of Block Islanders and mainland Rhode Islanders.    As recent as February 4, 2014, former New Shoreham Town Council Members were once again  misleading public officials by providing commentary at a formal Open Meeting before the RI Coastal  Resources Management Council (CRMC) indicating that a majority of Block Islanders supported the  pending Deepwater windfarm contemplated by the latter’s application for permits before the CRMC.   How does this happen?  On July 8, 2009, the Block Island Town Council requested Lefteris Pavlides, a professor at Roger  Williams University, to conduct a survey of Block Island registered voters or land owners to “find out  whether Block Island residents would support or oppose a wind park off the shores of Block Island.”  (see cover of the “Pavlides Survey”).  The Survey included 24 directed questions and seven images.   The cover photo on the Survey and the important simulations were taken from actual aerial and  ground photography of the Scroby Sands Wind Farm in the North Sea 1.6 miles off the coast of  Eastern England.  The Survey clearly uses the Scroby Sands Wind Farm as the benchmark for what  survey participants were to expect for the wind farm contemplated 2.8 miles off of Block Island.  The Scroby Windfarm was commissioned in 2004, consisting of 30 wind turbines.  The turbines have  a capacity factor of just 2 megawatts each and stand at top blade height 330 feet above the mean  sea level.  For reference purposes, the top of the SE Lighthouse stands approximately 300 feet  above sea level.    Survey results provided by the Town Council indicate that a slight majority of Block Islanders would  be open minded for a wind farm of some kind having turbines similar to those in the Scroby  Windfarm.  But, that is surely NOT what we will be getting on Block Island if the project continues.   The Survey is no longer a valid representation of resident opinions.  You see, based upon disclosures made by Deepwater in its pending CRMC application, the windfarm  it is seeking to build will consist of 5 turbines that have capacity factors of 6 megawatts and stand  approximately 600 feet at top blade tip height.  This windfarm is far different than the one  contemplated by the Pavlides Survey.  Continuing to cite the Survey as public support for the  windfarm is at least irresponsible, and possibly redressible, since it continues to be cited by Town  Council Members who were sitting Council Members at the time the Survey was commissioned by  the Town. To put this scale difference into perspective, consider this – at 330 feet max height (not the 600 feet  as we know now), the wind turbines cited in the Pavlides Survey would stand only slightly higher than  the SE Bluffs themselves, making the turbines visible only to those standing right on, or close to, the  bluffs or across water from other island locations.  This is no longer relevant information and now  obsolete.  In April 2013, the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Office (RI SHPO) requested Deepwater to  provide answers to questions regarding visual impact that its proposed windfarm would have on  registered Historical Landmarks.  In May 2013, the Public Archaeology Laboratory (PAL), on behalf of  Deepwater, submitted a technical memorandum is response to the RI SHPO request.  The PAL report  provides viewshed modeling data and topography exposure results on all island locations (public and  private).   The report provides detailed viewshed data over the entire island for all or parts of the  turbines The report examines from where on the island you will be affected by the turbine flashing  lights, or just the moving blade tips.    You could be relaxing on a boat in the Great Salt Pond and find it tough to ignore 3 of the 5 turbines  turning blades 6 miles away.  From your boat looking towards our Fire Station, Town Hall, Spring  Street, over The Atlantic Inn, past the SE Light the turning wind farm blades and blinking lights will be  part of island life 24/7– All from sitting on a dinghy in the Great Salt Pond.   So, yes, the PAL report to the Historic Preservation Office indicates that what Deepwater plans for us  is a far cry from the visualization provided in the Pavlides Survey.  No one, let alone former Town  Council Members or the leadership of BIRA, should be citing the Pavlides Survey to sitting regulators  as resident support for the fantastically different windfarm contemplated by Deepwater.  Stop pulling  the wool over the eyes of your constituency.  Bait and Switch, all around.  
Michael Beauregard, J. D. Mike and his family are Block Island residents. He has advance degrees in economics, business and law.
Add your comments — see main page.
You could be relaxing on a  boat in the Great Salt Pond  and find it tough to ignore 3  of the 5 turbines turning  blades 6 miles away.
“The RI Public Utilities Commission, upon reviewing the initial proposal for the project, denied approval for the project to proceed based upon its finding that the project was not economically viable.”